Which of the following statements about reporting licensure violations is true?

The statement that reports should include supporting evidence is essential for the integrity and effectiveness of the reporting process regarding licensure violations. When a report is substantiated with supporting evidence, it provides the necessary context and details that can help regulatory bodies investigate the claims thoroughly. This could include documentation, witness statements, or any relevant information that illustrates the nature of the violation. Evidence is critical because it helps establish the legitimacy of the report and assists in ensuring that actions taken are based on factual information rather than unsubstantiated claims.

In contrast, while it may seem beneficial for a report to be optional or for only the pharmacy owner to be responsible for reporting, these approaches would likely hinder the accountability and transparency necessary in the profession. Additionally, although the option of submitting reports anonymously can foster a sense of security for individuals making reports, requiring supporting evidence ensures that any action taken is founded on a solid basis. This reinforces the system's reliability and helps maintain public trust in the regulatory process surrounding pharmacy practice.